Operation Save Rachel: Chancellor smiles for the cameras at NHS plan launch and says it is 'great to be here' - as Keir claims he didn't NOTICE her crying at PMQs
Proper news from Britain - News from Britain you won’t find anywhere else. Not the tosh the big media force-feed you every day!
Rachel Reeves put on a smile for cameras today as she appeared at an NHS plan launch less than 24 hours after her dramatic tears at PMQs.
The Chancellor was flanked at the event in London by Keir Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting - who heaped praise on her.
She said it was 'great to be here today', but did not refer to the scenes from yesterday.
The PM has given a guarantee that Ms Reeves will remain in her job 'into the next election and for many years after' amid continuing mystery over her public show of emotion.
Markets slowly recovered ground this morning after being spooked by the the Commons meltdown and speculation Ms Reeves might be on the way out.
Interest rates on gilts - the way the government borrows money - have subsided and the Pound has stabilised. Ms Reeves is said to have told MPs before the episode that she was 'under pressure' with an apparent £30-£40billion pound black hole in the public finances.
After Downing Street denied claims of a bust up at the top ranks of government, Sir Keir insisted that the cause of Ms Reeves' misery was 'purely personal', saying that politicians are 'humans'.
Extraordinarily, he also suggested he did not notice his Chancellor was crying next to him because he was busy answering questions - even though Kemi Badenoch was telling him that Ms Reeves looked 'miserable'.
'If it had been anybody else at work it would not really have been noticed,' he told Virgin Radio.
Sir Keir suggested he had 'personally didn't appreciate it was happening in the chamber' because he was answering questions.
He also appeared to double down on Ms Reeves' stance on her 'cast iron' fiscal rules - despite the increasingly parlous state of the public finances.
'She and I are absolutely committed to our fiscal rules,' he said.
Sir Keir said the Chancellor's tears were 'nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with the ups and downs of this week, or her relationship with anybody in the Labour Party, it's purely personal'.
He said: 'What I would say is – and you'll understand this – in politics, you're on show the whole time, there's no hiding place.
'But we are humans in the end and sometimes personal things are obviously on our minds and, in this case, that was the situation.'
He said they were 'absolutely committed to our fiscal rules and the economic stability that is so important for this country, and that is the rock on which we build everything else'.
'On that issue, Rachel and I are in lockstep, and have been for years.'
He added: 'She's great colleague. She's a friend of mine and I'll be working with her for a very long time to come.
'But like all human beings, we're also personal. There are moments that catch us off guard and if you're in front of a camera for large periods of your life, unfortunately, that could be caught on camera in a way, if it had been anybody else at work, it would have not really been noticed.'
The Chancellor is said to clashed with Speaker Lindsay Hoyle just before PMQs after he rebuked her for giving over-long answers at Treasury questions on Tuesday.
To Sir Lindsay's surprise, she burst into tears and was heard to remark she was 'under so much pressure'.
Ms Reeves appeared to become particularly emotional as Sir Keir refused to guarantee she will be in her job until the next election.
Afterwards she was seen being comforted by her sister Ellie - also a Labour minister - as she left the chamber, although Sir Keir did not speak to her.
Ms Reeves' spokesman insisted afterwards that it was a 'personal matter' and he would not be 'getting into' the reasons.
No10 and No11 both denied claims Ms Reeves had an argument with Sir Keir before they entered the Commons.
One Cabinet minister told the Mail's Dan Hodges: 'She was already on edge after an argument she had with Angela Rayner over the benefits climbdown. Then when Lindsay had a little pop that pushed her over the edge. But it wasn't his fault. It wasn't really about him.'
But allies of Ms Rayner dismissed the suggestion of a row as 'b***ocks', insisting the Deputy Prime Minister had not spoken to Ms Reeves before PMQs.
In a separate interview with the BBC last night, Sir Keir denied any rift between them and said her tears had 'nothing to do with politics' or Labour's embarrassing U-turns on benefits.
'That's absolutely wrong,' he said. '[it's] nothing to do with what's happened this week. It was a personal matter for her, I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you.'
He added: 'She's done an excellent job as chancellor and we have delivered inward investment to this country in record numbers. She and I work together, we think together', he said.
'In the past there have been examples - I won't give any specifics - of chancellors and prime ministers who weren't in lockstep. We're in lockstep.'
Health Secretary Wes Streeting said Ms Reeves was a 'tough cookie'.
'It's why with the choices she's made, not always the most popular choices, is creating the conditions for our economy to grow,' he told ITV's Peston.
Mr Streeting added Ms Reeves has 'something going on personally, not professionally'.
'It's easy to forget that we're all humans as politicians and we have lives like everyone else,' he continued.
Interest rates on 10-year and 30-year gilts - effectively the cost of government borrowing - spiked and the pound slipped sharply against the US dollar as the Commons scenes unfolded earlier.
Just a year on from his election landslide, Sir Keir's authority has been left in tatters after his extraordinary surrender to avert defeat at the hands of Labour rebels.
Ms Badenoch said he had made 'mistake after mistake', highlighting volte faces over grooming gangs and winter fuel allowance. She also pointed to a visibly-upset Reeves, sitting next to the PM, saying she looked 'miserable' and was being used as a 'human shield'.
Last night Sir Keir effectively tore up his benefits reforms, which had been due to shave £5billion a year off spirallling costs by the end of the Parliament - but will now actually increase spending by £100million.
The move heaped misery on Ms Reeves, who was already struggling to fill a black hole in the public finances that could amount to tens of billions of pounds.
Touring broadcast studios this morning, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden warned there would be 'financial consequences' - hinting that the tax burden will need to rise again.
Ms Reeves has insisted Labour will stick to manifesto pledges of no hikes to income tax, employee National Insurance or VAT. And she had been adamant that she will not break her 'cast iron' fiscal rules.
But she refused to guarantee yesterday that the hated freeze in tax thresholds will not be extended.
In highly emotional scenes at PMQs, Ms Badenoch said: 'This man has forgotten that his welfare bill was there to plug a black hole created by the Chancellor. Instead they're creating new ones. They're creating new ones.
'(Ms Reeves) is pointing at me, she looks absolutely miserable. Labour MPs are going on the record saying that the Chancellor is toast, and the reality is that she is a human shield for his incompetence. In January, he said that she would be in post until the next election. Will she really?'
Sir Keir replied: '(Mrs Badenoch) certainly won't. I have to say, I'm always cheered up when she asks me questions or responds to a statement because she always makes a complete mess of it and shows just how unserious and irrelevant they are.
'She talks about the black hole, they left a £22billion black hole in our economy and we're clearing it up, and I'm really proud that in the first year of a Labour Government, we got free school meals, breakfast clubs, childcare, got £15 billion invested in transport in the North and the Midlands.
'We're cutting regulation, planning and infrastructure is pounding forward, building 1.5 million homes, the biggest investment in social and affordable housing, and of course the three trade deals.'
Mrs Badenoch replied: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.'
Challenged afterwards why Sir Keir failed to give Ms Reeves the vote of confidence, the PM's press secretary said: 'He has done so repeatedly.
'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the Prime Minister's full backing.
'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.
'The Chancellor and the Prime Minister are focused entirely on delivering for working people.
'It's thanks to the Chancellor's management of the economy that we managed to restore stability, which has led to four interest rate cuts, wages rising faster than inflation and she recently delivered a spending review that invested in Britain's national renewal.'
Asked whether the Prime Minister still had confidence in Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, the press secretary said: 'Yes.'
A spokesman for the Chancellor said: 'It's a personal matter which, as you would expect, we are not going to get into.
'The Chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon.'
Aides to Speaker Lindsay Hoyle refused to comment on claims he had a row with Ms Reeves shortly before the PMQs session began.
But MPs believe Sir Lindsay only rebuked Ms Reeves for giving excessively long answers at Treasury questions yesterday, with the Speaker surprised that she immediate became upset.
The pair had already exchanged words on the subject during the session yesterday.
One MP told MailOnline that the cause was a spat with the PM before that clash. 'There has been a major row before, just before she walked in. I think it was with Keir,' they said.
However, both No10 and No11 denied that there was any argument between Ms Reeves and Sir Keir.
After the session, Mrs Badenoch's spokesman said 'personal matter doesn't really clear it up' and 'you normally tell people what the personal matter is'.
He added: 'I'm not going to speculate… I think we should find out what's going on.'
Labour circles have been in a frenzy over how the Chancellor will handle the crisis in the public finances. One MP said: 'She is in massive trouble. This government has lost control. It is the worst politics of anybody - it doesn't matter whether you are left or right.
'Governments get this after four years, but we're not even at one year.'
Rather than leaving the Commons immediate after PMQs as usual, Sir Keir remained on the estate for about two hours having meetings.
Meanwhile, rebel ringleaders gloated that they had 'power' over the PM and stepped up demands for a lurch to the Left.
Rachael Maskell, whose fatal amendment sparked the benefits shambles, urged a £24billion 'wealth tax' to pay for more handouts.
Deputy PM Angela Rayner is said to have brokered the deal with rebels, fueling speculation that she is positioning to succeed Sir Keir. Opponents jibed it is obvious that Sir Keir will not now lead the party into the next election.
Appearing on ITV's Lorraine show, Ms Rayner insisted she did not want the top job, joking that it would 'age me by 10 years'.
Told that Sir Keir looked 'tired' and 'exhausted', she said: 'It's a very challenging job. To be fair for Keir Starmer there's been a lot going on...
'There's a lot going on and the PM's been here there and everywhere doing the job for Britain.'
Amid carnage at Westminster yesterday, the PM's carefully assembled truce with rebels dramatically disintegrated.
Facing the threat of a massive revolt, Sir Keir opted to make yet another major concession just 90 minutes before the vote.
Ministers pledged that changes to disability handouts will not be finalised until after a review - meaning that the package as it stands will actually make the current system more expensive than before up to 2029.
Sir Keir - who is days away from marking the first anniversary of his election landslide - had already agreed that the benefits curbs would only apply to new claimants.
There was mocking laughter in the chamber as Social Security Minister Stephen Timms was asked how much the proposals would save now, and merely replied that the government would 'set out figures in the usual way'.
Despite the humiliating manoeuvres, when the vote was held 44 Labour MPs still backed the fatal amendment and others abstained - although it was comfortably defeated by 328 to 149 as Tories largely stayed away.
Shortly afterwards, the Bill cleared second reading stage by 335 to 260, with the rebellion growing to 49. It will now be scrutinised at committee, where there could be further problems.
Mr McFadden told BBC Breakfast he is 'not going to speculate' on what could be in the Autumn Budget but there would be 'financial consequences'.
'This is one moving part of the budgetary picture, it does have a financial consequence yesterday,' he said.
'I'm not going to speculate on where the budget lands, because there are so many other different moving parts in it, and it wouldn't make sense for me to do that.'
Asked explicitly whether he could rule out tax rises, Mr McFadden said: 'I'm not going to speculate on the budget.
'We will keep to the tax promises that we made in our manifesto when we fought the election last year. But it doesn't make sense for me to speculate on something where, as I say, there are so many moving parts of which this is only one element.'
Ms Rayner said Ms Reeves would have to 'look' at the finances in the Autumn after the benefits overhaul.
'That does have a cost to it… that will have to be set out in the Budget in the normal way. Rachel, our chancellor, will have to look at the challenges we face,' she said.
Presenter Lorraine Kelly said to the Deputy PM of Sir Keir: 'You're working with him all the time - he looks absolutely exhausted. Some have said he might not be here after xmas, he doesn't have the stomach for it or anything.'
Ms Rayner replied: 'Even before I was in politics, I said that have you ever seen a prime minister after a year or two in government?
'And people always say to me, do you want to be Prime Minister? Not a chance. It'll age me by 10 years within six months.'
She added: 'It is a very challenging job, and there's been, to be fair for Keir Starmer, there's been a lot going on.
'He's been all around the world trying to repair the relationships in Europe. We've got the trade deals that the previous government wasn't able to do, tackling the things like the tariffs that the President in the US wanted to put onto the UK, which would have damaged our economy again.
'There's a lot going on, and the Prime Minister's been […] here, there and everywhere, doing the job for Britain.'
Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice has referred to Sir Keir's first year in office as 'the worst start for any newly elected prime minister'.
He told Times Radio that the PM was 'never especially popular' and that 'the public still don't know what he stands for.'
Pressed if she would be interested in taking over No10 at some point, Ms Rayner told the ITV programme: 'No'.
She said that she is 'passionate' about issues including workers' rights and council housing.
'I'm very interested in delivering for the people of this country, because … to be elected as an MP from my background was incredible,' she said.
'Having that opportunity to serve my community that have raised me, looked after me, given me opportunities, and I don't forget that. And to be Deputy Prime Minister of this country … it's got to count for something.'
Ms Maskell told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that 'we need to look at those with the broader shoulders' to balance the books.
She said she was also 'worried about public finances'.
'And that's why I think we heard very much in the debate, including from myself, that we need to look at those with the broader shoulders, as the Prime Minister said, contributing more into our system, but never pushing down on the poorest,' she said.
'And that was what the dynamic was yesterday, that we do need to look at things like a wealth tax, £24 billion, or equalisation of capital gains tax.'
Rachel Reeves' teary PMQs
11.59am - Rachel Reeves is seen taking her seat in the Commons ahead of PMQs. Her eyes appear puffy.
An MP behind her taps her on the shoulder - perhaps asking if she is ok - before receiving a reply from the Chancellor.
Ms Reeves then cracks a smile as she talks to Sir Keir Starmer on the Labour front bench.
12.12pm - Ms Reeves responds after Tory leader Kemi Badenoch notes how the Chancellor 'looks absolutely miserable'.
12.13pm - A tear rolls down Ms Reeves' face.
It came as Sir Keir failed to provide an answer to Mrs Badenoch's question about whether the Chancellor would remain in post until the next general election.
12.31pm - Ms Reeves' bottom lip wobbles and tears roll down both her cheeks as the PM answers a question from Glasgow North MP Martin Rhodes.
12.37pm - The Chancellor leaves the House of Commons chamber after PMQs finishes.
